Okay,,, I've stayed quiet on this topic but I will begin to interject my chemist's monkey wrench.
Global Warming Flaws:
1. As scientists can only produce tangible,
accurate data for the last 800 to 1000 years, there is simply no reliable way of knowing what "normal" global temperatures, sea levels, CO2 levels, etc. have been over the lifetime of the earth. Scientists
speculate that the earth is some 4.5 billion years old.... great, wonderful, "that's so awesome...."
So what? Let's say every human being lives a mere 100 years,,,, with the existence of man on our beloved earth for some 200,000 years.
Let's just look at the numbers for argument's sake....
Human Being Lifespan : 100 years
Existence of Man on Earth: 200,000 years
Age of the Earth: 4,500,000,000 years
Again, so what?
Well,,, I'll tell you what... math helps a great deal here.
If we are soooooooooooooooo concerned with CO2 emissions, consider that the Industrial Revolution began in about 1760 or so.... some 254 years ago. Let's "blame" the Global Warming phenomenon all these man-made machines that consume and combust fossil fuels for varying purposes.
Ask yourself: what is a 254-year length of time over the 4,500,000,000 years of the earth's age?
(254 years / 4,500,000,000 years) * 100% = 0.0000546%
This means that the entire global warming "theory" (laughable hoax really) is roughly based on human events with fossil fuels over a whopping 0.0000546% of the earth's life.
That's right folks..... an entire "indisputable fact" that global warming is devastating the earth based on a couple hundred years (use thousands if you like, it doesn't matter) of man's concern with the use of fossil fuels on the planet.
I am an advanced degreed scientist and science has served me well but it is pretty simple to see that the entire global warming "fact" (and all of its knee-jerk associated EPA and governmental reactions and regulations) is based on events that amount to no more than a "blink of an eye" relative to the age of the earth itself. Simple statistics will tell you that there exists a normal oscillation of attributes over time (like earth temperature and sea levels, etc.) and no one can positively say that any slight increase or decrease in these attributes are not part of the normal variance of the earth. Sorry "indisputable facts".... math and statistics win this round.
There is simply no way of definitively knowing if any increase in sea levels, ice thickness at the polar caps, recent minute increased temperatures of the earth are (or are not)
normal variances of the earth itself.... we simply have not existed on the planet long enough, we don't live long enough, and we do not know when the life of the earth actually "ends."
Bummer huh?
LOLOLOL!!!!