Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
1
General Outdoor Furnace Discussion / insurance company wont insure with outdoor boiler
« on: June 20, 2008, 07:06:54 PM »
called my insurance company (one beacon) to get the minimum distance they wanted an owb located from any buildings and they said that they would not insure the home for anything associated or caused by the owb no matter where it was located. will be looking for a new carrier. any one else check on this or have a problem?
steve
steve
2
General Outdoor Furnace Discussion / Re: How to determine how many BTU I need
« on: June 19, 2008, 04:57:52 AM »Have not really started looking "seriously" at any one unit, but it sems I need to know what my btu needs are to match up against the proper unit? We have apprx. 1700 sq ft of living area and around 30% of it is newly constructed that is very well insulated. The only mention on my present oil boiler of anything btu shows Water MBTU 125.2/hr. Not sure what that means but this boiler provides plenty of heat and hot water for our needs.not sure but i think your boiler is 125200 btu. if it runs at 92% efficency, that would be 125200 X.92 = 115184btu output.
OUTPUT efficiancy for owbs vary widely depending upon wood moisture content, heat loss from the shell and piping, how well the boiler transfers heat from the fire to the water and how long the fire idles (smokes) without calling for heat.
some say as low as 30% for a poorly designed and poorly operated boiler.
add to that the many different opinions of the people youre going to talk to and as far as i can see, its a crap shoot!
check out these guys; http://www.hearth.com/econtent/index.php/forums/
they tend to lean toward the new gasifiers with storage but there are some really good boiler people there that will help you
steve
3
Home Made / Re: convert
« on: June 18, 2008, 10:45:33 AM »steve..in the photo i posted earlier inthis thred of my "now" stove..it is infact a 36inch pipe inside a 42 inch pipe filled with water..it works well but i think the water cooled jacket in fact cools the gasses too quickly and a lot of potential heat is going up the stackand that is why the owb as they have been designed in the past, are so smoky and ineffecient.
i dont know exactly how the new gassifier boilers work since i have just begun to research and look at them.
i dont think it makes any difference where you get the high temperatires that burns the wood gasses whether it is in the actual firebox or in a secondary chamber. just as long as you reach those 1500-2000 degree temps and then send them into a heat exchanger to extract the heat.
maybe one of the gassifier gurus could chime in here and do some splainin to us.
4
Home Made / Re: convert
« on: June 18, 2008, 05:17:52 AM »
it would be a lot of work to build the stove and have the firebox disintegrate. there isnt much heat transference from the inner pipe to the fire brick like there would be if it was air cooled or water cooled so i suspect that heat would build up to the point that the inner pipe would fail.
im not a big fan of using refractory in the firebox either simply because i want to be able to throw the wood in and not have to worry about breaking it.
im thinking that a water jacketed firebox might be the way to go and try to make the wood gasses burn hotter in another refractory lined chamber. then send the super hot burning gasses on to the heat exchanger.
as to the secondary air, it all depends what you have for a chimney draft to pull the air in.
i guess im like you in that im just in the planning stages right now and will consider all suggestions.
steve
im not a big fan of using refractory in the firebox either simply because i want to be able to throw the wood in and not have to worry about breaking it.
im thinking that a water jacketed firebox might be the way to go and try to make the wood gasses burn hotter in another refractory lined chamber. then send the super hot burning gasses on to the heat exchanger.
as to the secondary air, it all depends what you have for a chimney draft to pull the air in.
i guess im like you in that im just in the planning stages right now and will consider all suggestions.
steve
5
Home Made / Re: convert
« on: June 17, 2008, 05:27:22 AM »very cool, did you build it?yes double..i built it...i am planning on another one in a year when i retire...i have aquired another property and i want to build one with a (i have a tank allready) 1200 gallon tank..i am hoping to fire it one time a day at most and have it keep the things near 60 when i am there and above freezing while i am away .....im not much on making refractry so i am thinking of a 36 inch pipe inside a 42 inch pipe filled with fire brick between them...i hope to achieve very high temps burning this way....then have the heat move out the chimey into a second barrel that will have tubes (big enough i can brush them) for the heat to go through and have them surrounded by water...then circulate the water through my 1200 gallon tank untill the set temp is achieved
you think this may work/..i am looking for all kinds of input..then i can have way more ideas to contemplate on
if your inner 36"pipe is insulated from the outer 42" pipe with firebrick, wont it get hot enough to melt or did i misunderstand your plan?
also, when you go from the burn chamber to the heat exchanger, you might think about putting a secondary air inlet in order to give the gasses an additional chance to burn befor the exchanger cools them.
steve
Pages: [1]