I appreciate everyone’s input on my air in the system dilemma. But finding that piece of the puzzle has only made me feel that there is more missing.
I have B&G 100 pumps on my boiler at work. The maintenance guy told me that they were an "industry standard" and you couldn't beat them because would work in almost every application, so I used them on my wood boiler at home. I have a friend with a wood boiler that has a B&G NRF-22 on it, which I thought looked way to small for what I was doing. After all, it was only 1/25hp Vs. the 1/12 of the 100, certainly won't do the job.
After educating myself on pumps and how to read the pump charts, now I am more confused than ever; but, In all of this I guess I found my minimum requirements. I have read through the B&G website and compared/contrasted the pumps that are approximately the same in pump volumes and head pressures.
My question is:
How can the B&G 100 compete with a pump the size of a softball, is half the hp, uses half the electricity, costs a quarter as much, and pumps the same amount of water @ equal head pressure? I feel like I should sell all of 100's I have, including the ones at work, put these little pumps in their place and be further ahead.
What is the advantage of the 100 as the "industry standard"? How come everyone doesn't use the smaller and more efficient pumps? I feel like I've cheated myself,
but it's my own fault (especially after I just bought a brand new B&G 100 trying to solve the air problem
)