If we are expected to believe the alleged science pertaining to global warming, than we must disregard the scientific laws we've came to know as thermodynamics.
This system we exist in is constantly trying to achieve equilibrium(our universe is is trying to extinguish the sun, while the sun is attempting to heat up the universe).
The sun is on it's way out, it is getting smaller, and it is "dying"; therefore is is cooling.
There will be a time in the VERY, VERY distant future (ie billions and billions of years) that the earth and the sun will be the same temperature.
As our universe cools it's star (the sun), that temperature most certainly will NOT be warmer.
Folks need to do some "blinders off" climatic research to understand the how's and why's when the subject of this planet's current temperature trends comes up. Look into who funds the quoted research to establish it's validity.
We learned back in the '70s (when I was in high school) that there were periods in recent human history (less than 2000 years ago) where many decades passed where the temperatures globally were higher than what we've witnessed in the last 20 years, as well as consecutive decades where there were global temperatures that were so low that they were referred to as "mini ice ages". I don't remember the means by which the scientific communities employed to determine these changes in climate that occurred hundreds and hundreds of years ago, nor do I really care.
What I do care about, and what really concerns me, is when folks buy in to the propaganda that scum like Al Gore try to pass off as undisputed, undeniable, scientific fact, without first researching it's validity by means of who funded it's authors.
There is quite a bit of misinformation and inaccuracy in your post.
First, global warming happens, the theory is sound and holds water and has been proven many times. There are many variables in the equations, some of which are not fully understood, however when broken down and tested we can see the results, as well as observe the process happening to our planet presently. There is nothing that comes up against any laws of thermodynamics at all. I'm not sure how you have come to that conclusion.
Secondly, the sun is not on it's way out, it is actually on it's way to increasing size and output as the main sequence of hydrogen burning ends. After the helium synthesis completes carbon and oxygen synthesis begins, however at this time the sun is gigantic, and has completely roasted the planet Earth (all this happens well within the laws of thermodynamics). After the helium has all been synthesised out, the sun will go planetary nebula, and then enter the dwarf stage. From then out out entropy will become prevalent as the star cools out.
As for the earth and the sun being the same temperature, that is most likely not going to be so, as the earth will most likely be consumed and destroyed during the ending helium synthesis.
You do bring up a good point, although I think your means are severely misguided. We need to do more research about our planet and climate to get a better understanding of what is going on as far as anthropic means are concerned. Simply saying that people are blinded or that the only reason for research is to consume dollars is silly and frankly showing signs of being blinded.
Actually almost every reconstruction done by pro and anti global warming scientists shows that we are now hotter than any time in the past several thousand years, specifically during the medieval warm period.
Finally you seem to be a bit overly critical of other's work (scum like Al Gore), while not fully understanding the information you yourself present (and apparently "nor do you really care").
Neal