Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
16
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: July 30, 2019, 09:30:05 PM »
Well said Marty.
18
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: July 17, 2019, 05:42:24 PM »
Good point wreckedit. Says right here http://www.polarfurnace.com/products/gclass that the polar is 99.5% efficient! Wowsa.
19
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: July 17, 2019, 12:34:48 PM »
*sigh* not sure how else I can say this so you can understand. What is referenced on that spreadsheet may not be what you think of as "stack temp". In other words it's not what you think it is.
20
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: July 17, 2019, 07:32:47 AM »
Gee, was "You interpreted something as stack temp which may or may not actually be what you would think of as "stack temps"" not clear enough?
21
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: July 16, 2019, 02:08:49 PM »
Negative, what I'm saying is that I never "proudly posted stack temps". I posted the testing results for
People to see. You interpreted something as stack temp which may or may not actually be what you would think of as "stack temps".
People to see. You interpreted something as stack temp which may or may not actually be what you would think of as "stack temps".
22
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: July 16, 2019, 09:48:43 AM »
You are wrong to have accused me of "proudly posting stack numbers" I did no such thing.
23
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: July 16, 2019, 06:59:30 AM »
Honda, are we still talking about those bogus numbers on the stack temps of the HeatMaster G 200 that you were so proud to post?
This is what you stated. I replied for you to show me where I stated that I was "proud to post stack numbers". In reality I posted a link to the testing numbers that intertek gathered for people to look at and YOU misinterpreted the numbers without knowledge of how they were gathered, for what purpose and if they were even relevant to the actual testing being done. You then insisted in the lack of knowledge that they must be fraudulent because you didn't understand them. Again, a joke.
This is what you stated. I replied for you to show me where I stated that I was "proud to post stack numbers". In reality I posted a link to the testing numbers that intertek gathered for people to look at and YOU misinterpreted the numbers without knowledge of how they were gathered, for what purpose and if they were even relevant to the actual testing being done. You then insisted in the lack of knowledge that they must be fraudulent because you didn't understand them. Again, a joke.
24
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: July 15, 2019, 04:29:29 PM »
The Internet is a big world of
History. Post for everyone to see a link to where I stated such.
History. Post for everyone to see a link to where I stated such.
25
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: July 14, 2019, 07:09:35 PM »
Wierd, I thought I heard from someone that those testing procedures from the epa were "poor" and "not repeatable with consistency". Suddenly they are highly accurate when used to compare to a polar unit. What a joke.
26
General Outdoor Furnace Discussion / Re: Is a Non-Epa stove allowed to heat an outbuilding?
« on: July 11, 2019, 06:42:39 AM »
Is the heat loss calc for sizing to overcome a temp differential or maintain a given temp?
27
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: June 30, 2019, 06:53:58 AM »
Lol, good luck with your secret dealer.
28
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: June 29, 2019, 12:25:10 PM »
This would be a great example of mudslinging if you weren't aware of what that is.
It seems that he prioritized being able to cash in on the rebate and doesn’t want dealers he can’t contact or experimental designs that change on the wims of the manufacturer for the worse.
Ohh and by the way. You may want to check out your own brands website that states the Polar gasser is 99.5% efficient. Seems a bit " misleading to those new customers "
It seems that he prioritized being able to cash in on the rebate and doesn’t want dealers he can’t contact or experimental designs that change on the wims of the manufacturer for the worse.
Ohh and by the way. You may want to check out your own brands website that states the Polar gasser is 99.5% efficient. Seems a bit " misleading to those new customers "
29
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: June 29, 2019, 07:01:08 AM »
Wow, that's a lot of mud slinging towards a manufacturer from an industry " professional".
30
Crown Royal / Re: Crown Royal efficiency numbers
« on: June 29, 2019, 05:18:37 AM »
Lol, sounds like he searched out an unbiased Opinion. Why don't you invite him to contact some owners of different products So he can have some different view points. You can probably fill out the dealer inquiry form if you are interested in a dealer servicing your area.