Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Username: Password:
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Is the Ultimizer really more efficient then Optimizer???  (Read 6165 times)

Pinehouse4

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 119
  • OWF Brand: Portage and Main
  • OWF Model: BL 34/44
  • .
    • View Profile
Re: Is the Ultimizer really more efficient then Optimizer???
« Reply #15 on: March 05, 2015, 09:44:51 PM »
From my research prior to purchase I believe the 250 is more efficient. However I chose the Ultimizer because the stove is very forgiving. You do not have to worry about the wood you burn. It will take anything and convert it to ashes. I am currently burning fresh cut oak and 70 year old plantation Black Locust, all cut within the past month. I split some of the bigger oak blocks in half. I needed to conserve my smaller split and dry firewood for syrup making.  Love this stove.

Bob
Logged
Stihl 028
Stihl 046
Wallenstien 820 wood processor
JD 6300 4 WD loader, blade, blower, forks,
BL 34/44 working great.

ijon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 263
  • OWF Brand: Portage and main
  • OWF Model: 28-40
    • View Profile
Re: Is the Ultimizer really more efficient then Optimizer???
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2015, 04:08:37 AM »
Good  posting. :thumbup:
Logged
installed in 2014
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »