Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Username: Password:
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Pumped side arm vs.fphe  (Read 5715 times)

RSI

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3100
  • OWF Brand: HeatMaster
  • OWF Model: G200 and B250
    • View Profile
    • RSI
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #15 on: April 24, 2014, 08:50:23 AM »

The only difference between copper types is the wall thickness. I have seen one company saying that about the type M but they were cutting a spiral grove in the pipe and if they used the thinner pipe it would most likely fail because of the grove they cut in it.
Logged

LittleJohn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 494
  • OWF Brand: Central Boiler
  • OWF Model: E-Classic 2400
  • Lonsdale, MN
    • View Profile
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #16 on: April 24, 2014, 09:05:03 AM »

True about Cu pipe sizes, but just remember they only make one size Cu fittings they don't make M,K,L type fittings. So like always fittings and joints are were you will see issues
Logged

idahohay

  • Guest
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #17 on: April 24, 2014, 01:24:04 PM »

The fittings seem to be getting pretty thin but the price gets thicker. The 2x1x1 tee's were 21.55 ea. Same outfit had copper tee's listed up to 8" with a price of  2,126.95. Don't know what 8"copper would be used for but would probably take a roll of solder to make up one tee!
Logged

slimjim

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 158
  • OWF Brand: Wood Doctor / HeatMaster
  • OWF Model: 14,000. / G 200 and G 400
  • Southern Maine
    • View Profile
    • www.mainlycustom.com
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #18 on: April 25, 2014, 05:11:41 AM »

They do make the fitting but you do not want to have to pay for it, you can get a close bushing, 1 inch to 3/4 that works nice but you will need to remove the stop in it so the 3/4 pipe will slide all the way through, another thing that I do is to solder scrap pieces of 12 gauge wire loosely to the 3/4 inch pipe, this increases the surface area of the copper exposed to the wood boiler side of the heat exchanger, ( better transfer ) as for the L or M copper, because it is domestic pressurized water it should be L as it is thicker wall
Logged
Wood boiler sales, service and installation for the Northeastern USA.

farmboythegreat

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 165
  • OWF Brand: freisen
  • OWF Model: 33hd
    • View Profile
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #19 on: April 25, 2014, 05:16:26 AM »

if a guy  built a side arm but before soldering together  he fabed a piece of copper to be like a grain auger  and soldered it to inside pipe  ....  how  u think that  work ??
Logged
Muir Ontario Canada

slimjim

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 158
  • OWF Brand: Wood Doctor / HeatMaster
  • OWF Model: 14,000. / G 200 and G 400
  • Southern Maine
    • View Profile
    • www.mainlycustom.com
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #20 on: April 25, 2014, 05:21:20 AM »

Awesome!
Logged
Wood boiler sales, service and installation for the Northeastern USA.

Sprinter

  • Do it right the first time, its cheaper In the long run
  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 474
  • OWF Brand: Indoor Boiler
  • OWF Model: Menominee
  • In the long run
    • View Profile
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #21 on: April 29, 2014, 06:33:02 AM »

If you don't exceed 2'-3' per second velocity type M copper will be fine. Most I've seen were M. Do a search on sidearms, there is a few pics of the multi pipe version I mentioned.  Making an auger won't help. You need to increase the surface area of heat exchange to make any difference. Surface area play a much larger role than flow and temps.
Logged
Michigan Thumber

slimjim

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 158
  • OWF Brand: Wood Doctor / HeatMaster
  • OWF Model: 14,000. / G 200 and G 400
  • Southern Maine
    • View Profile
    • www.mainlycustom.com
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #22 on: April 29, 2014, 11:48:15 AM »

I do not think you understand what he is saying sprinter!
Logged
Wood boiler sales, service and installation for the Northeastern USA.

idahohay

  • Guest
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #23 on: April 29, 2014, 07:12:02 PM »

Would 1" be better in the center than 3/4? But then it would need reduced which might affect the thermosyphon?


Logged

slimjim

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 158
  • OWF Brand: Wood Doctor / HeatMaster
  • OWF Model: 14,000. / G 200 and G 400
  • Southern Maine
    • View Profile
    • www.mainlycustom.com
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #24 on: April 30, 2014, 04:46:11 AM »

I do not think it will, in fact I would be concerned that you would be restricting the flow on the wood boiler side, believe me you will get plenty of very hot water with the standard setup
Logged
Wood boiler sales, service and installation for the Northeastern USA.

idahohay

  • Guest
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #25 on: April 30, 2014, 01:56:56 PM »

Thanks slimjim. My fittings are due to arrive tomorrow. Might still use Type m, it is legal here for domestic water. Should last my lifetime and my water pressure is less than 60 psi.  Will post some pics when I get it done and when installed.
Logged

slimjim

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 158
  • OWF Brand: Wood Doctor / HeatMaster
  • OWF Model: 14,000. / G 200 and G 400
  • Southern Maine
    • View Profile
    • www.mainlycustom.com
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #26 on: April 30, 2014, 03:03:39 PM »

It's all I ever use, if you had a leak it would simply overfill your boiler and you would notice it, never had one leak yet!
Logged
Wood boiler sales, service and installation for the Northeastern USA.

Sprinter

  • Do it right the first time, its cheaper In the long run
  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 474
  • OWF Brand: Indoor Boiler
  • OWF Model: Menominee
  • In the long run
    • View Profile
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #27 on: April 30, 2014, 04:37:03 PM »

Pipe size will not effect the thermosyphon, temp differences will. If your using those circs, you won't have to worry about restriction unless its a very long zone. You won't need much flow anyways, as it will not exchange as much as a flat plate.
Logged
Michigan Thumber

idahohay

  • Guest
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #28 on: May 03, 2014, 09:28:43 AM »

Here is what i came up with.  Used 32" of 2" copper.  I really like working with those big fittings. Was going to come out of the bottom tee straight up, but it would have blocked the elements on this heater.  The w/h goes in and to the right of the toilet, now I can finish the installation of the fphe for the closed in floor system.
Logged

NaturallyAspirated

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 443
  • OWF Brand: Central Boiler
  • OWF Model: M250
  • Golfing, snowmobiling fool!
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nealmastel.com
Re: Pumped side arm vs.fphe
« Reply #29 on: May 03, 2014, 09:32:19 AM »

Nice!  Gonna gets some of that nice PVC jacketed insulation on it?

Neal
Logged
Miss Farad was pretty and sensual, and charged to a reckless potential; but a rascal named Ohm conducted her home - Her decline was, alas, exponential
Send me your bitcoins!  1GEsGKzP5xK9e45YDjmRzGYpnhwT3oNbvj
Pages: 1 [2] 3